Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after using Roundup?

You can request a case review to determine whether your diagnosis and history of Roundup use may fit the claims currently being reviewed. You do not need to have every medical record or exact exposure date before contacting Bernstein Liebhard LLP.

Roundup lawsuits allege that exposure to Roundup and glyphosate-based weed killers is associated with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and that users were not adequately warned about the alleged cancer risk. Monsanto has denied that Roundup causes cancer and denies liability.

Monsanto has agreed to a proposed settlement of up to $7.25 billion addressing eligible Roundup cancer claims. The settlement has received preliminary approval but is not yet final, and individual recoveries, if any, can vary based on the circumstances of each claim.

No. The proposed settlement is still subject to final court approval. The final approval or fairness hearing is currently scheduled for September 14, 2026.

The proposed settlement addresses certain people exposed to covered Roundup or other glyphosate-based weed killer products in the United States before February 17, 2026, including people diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) now or in the future. Whether a particular person is covered depends on the settlement terms and individual circumstances.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is reviewing potential claims involving people who used Roundup before being diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or certain related lymphoma subtypes. Eligibility can depend on the diagnosis, timing, amount and circumstances of Roundup use, and other individual facts.

There is no single payment amount that applies to every claimant. Potential settlement awards or lawsuit recoveries can depend on factors such as the nature of the exposure, diagnosis, age and other claim-specific circumstances. No particular result can be guaranteed.

The proposed settlement uses claim criteria and award tiers rather than paying every claimant the same amount. Factors can include the claimant's diagnosis and exposure history. A case review can help identify which information may be important to evaluating a potential claim.

The proposed settlement must first receive final court approval and the claims process must proceed under the settlement terms. Payment timing can also depend on claim review, documentation, appeals and other court-supervised steps.

The claims currently being reviewed involve non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and certain related lymphoma subtypes. If you were diagnosed with lymphoma but do not know the exact subtype, you can still request a case review.

The amount and frequency of Roundup use can matter. You do not need to know the exact number of hours you used Roundup before contacting us. Our questionnaire asks how regularly Roundup was used and for how long so the legal team can evaluate the exposure history.

Potential claims may involve Roundup used around a home, yard, garden or other residential property. Both residential and occupational exposure may be relevant when a potential claim is evaluated.

Yes. Potential claims may involve occupational Roundup exposure, including use while farming, landscaping, groundskeeping, applying pesticides or performing similar work.

Jobs that may involve significant Roundup or glyphosate-based weed killer exposure include farming and farm labor, landscaping, groundskeeping, lawn service, gardening, maintenance work, pesticide spraying or application, tree and hedge trimming, highway or rail maintenance, and facilities management. The amount and circumstances of exposure still matter when a claim is evaluated.

Potentially, yes. Landscapers, groundskeepers and lawn service workers are among the occupations specifically identified in the proposed settlement's occupational-exposure examples. Whether someone qualifies as an Occupational Claimant depends on the settlement's exposure, work-income and documentation requirements.

Potentially, yes. Farmers, farm laborers and helpers are specifically listed among the proposed settlement's occupational examples. Agricultural work can involve Roundup exposure while mixing or applying herbicides or while planting, cultivating or harvesting crops, but individual eligibility depends on the facts and settlement requirements.

Examples include mixing or applying pesticides or herbicides; planting, cultivating or harvesting crops; landscaping or groundskeeping; maintaining athletic fields or golf courses; planting, watering or fertilizing gardens; and pruning or maintaining trees or shrubs. Exposure can also occur while working close to someone who is mixing, applying, handling or transporting Roundup products.

Immigration status does not prevent an otherwise eligible person from being included in the proposed settlement class. Bernstein Liebhard LLP represents migrant and undocumented workers, treats case-review information as confidential, and will not contact immigration authorities about a person's Roundup inquiry.

Our role is to evaluate and protect your potential legal claim, not to jeopardize your immigration status. If you are undocumented, a migrant worker or otherwise concerned about immigration status, you may still contact our firm for a confidential Roundup case review.

The claims currently being reviewed generally involve a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) at least one year after Roundup use began. The exact facts of an individual exposure and diagnosis should be reviewed before drawing a conclusion about eligibility.

That is common. You can provide your best estimate. You do not need exact dates or a precise number of hours to start a case review.

You can still contact us. Lymphoma diagnoses can have complicated names, and the legal team can review the information you have and determine whether additional details are needed.

Yes. A spouse or other family member may contact Bernstein Liebhard LLP about a potential Roundup claim, including circumstances involving a loved one who has died.

No. You do not need to gather every medical or exposure record before requesting a case review. The legal team can ask follow-up questions and explain what documentation may ultimately be needed.

Yes. A proposed settlement does not mean every person's legal situation is the same. A lawyer can review your diagnosis, exposure history and circumstances and discuss what options may be available to you.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP has represented plaintiffs since 1993 — more than 30 years — and is a nationally recognized plaintiffs’ law firm with extensive experience handling complex litigation. The firm has recovered more than $3.5 billion on behalf of its clients and the classes it has represented. You can meet our attorneys and review our results. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP has represented plaintiffs since 1993 and has more than 30 years of experience in complex litigation, including mass tort, pharmaceutical and medical device, consumer, antitrust and securities matters. The firm has been recognized by national legal publications and organizations for its plaintiffs’ litigation work. You can read more about the firm’s accomplishments and recognitions.

There is no cost to request a case review. You pay no attorney's fee unless Bernstein Liebhard LLP recovers money for you.